Site icon New

Forensic Psychiatry: Insanity

FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY: INSANITY


INTRODUCTION:

  • Insanity is an old term used loosely to denote any mental disorder or mental illness. The Indian Penal Code employs the term unsoundness of mind while referring to insanity.
  • Lucid  interval  is  the  period  of sanity (sound  mind)  in  an  insane  person,  i.e.  period  in  course  of mental illness  when  there  is  complete  sensation  of manifestations  of insanity. 
  • During this  period he  is  quite normal  and can make valid  will, sell/purchase  property,  give valid  evidence  and  is  legally  responsible for his  deeds.
  • Patient  is  kept  under  observation  for  l0  days  which can  be  extended upto maximum  30  days.

Civil  responsibilities  of insane:         

Management of property, Contract, Marriage, Competency  as  witness, Validity  of  consent, Civil  rights, Guardianship, Testamentary capacity (capacity  of  a person to make valid will).

Criminal responsibility  of insane

In  law,  criminal  responsibility  means  liability  to  punishment  for  the  crimes  committed.

Also that a  person  who is  proved  to  be  insane  is not  responsible  for  his  actions,  as  he  is  devoid of free will, intelligence  and knowledge  in  relation  to  his  acts.

The criminal  responsibility  of an  insane  is  judged by  rules:

1)      MC Naughten  rule  ( legal test  or right  or  wrong test).

It states that  an accused  person  is  not  legally  responsible,  if  it  is  clearly  proved  that  at the  time  of committing the crime,  person  was suffering  from such  a defect  of reason  from  abnormality  of  mind  that  he didn’t  know  the nature and  quality  of act he was  doing  or  that  what he  was doing  was  wrong i.e. a person  is  not  responsible  if  he is  not of sound mind   (section  84  IPC).

2)      Doctrine  of partial  responsibility: suffering  from  some  weakness  or  aberration  of mind  (though  not  completely  insane).

3)      Durhan  rule: Accused  is  not  responsible  for  the  act, if  his  act  resulted  from  mental disease  or defect.

4)      Currens  rule: A person is  not  responsible  if  at the  time  of  committing  the  crime,  he  did  not have the  to  regulate  his conduct according  to  the  requirments  of  law  as a result  of  his  mental disease  or defect.

Exam Important

INTRODUCTION:

  • The Indian Penal Code employs the term unsoundness of mind while referring to insanity.
  • Lucid  interval  is  the  period  of sanity (sound  mind)  in  an  insane  person,  i.e.  period  in  course  of mental illness  when  there  is  complete  cessation  of manifestations  of insanity. 
  • During this  period he  is  quite normal  and can make valid  will, sell/purchase  property,  give valid  evidence  and  is  legally  responsible for his  deeds.
  • Patient  is  kept  under  observation  for  l0  days  which can  be  extended upto maximum  30  days.

Civil  responsibilities  of insane:         

Management of property, Contract, Marriage, Competency  as  witness, Validity  of  consent, Civil  rights, Guardianship, Testamentary capacity (capacity  of  a person to make valid will).

Criminal responsibility  of insane

In  law,  criminal  responsibility  means  liability  to  punishment  for  the  crimes  committed.

Also that a  person  who is  proved  to  be  insane  is not  responsible  for  his  actions,  as  he  is  devoid of free will, intelligence  and knowledge  in  relation  to  his  acts.

The criminal  responsibility  of an  insane  is  judged by  rules:

1)      MC Naughten  rule  ( legal test  or right  or  wrong test).

It states that  an accused  person  is  not  legally  responsible,  if  it  is  clearly  proved  that  at the  time  of committing the crime,  person  was suffering  from such  a defect  of reason  from  abnormality  of  mind  that  he didn’t  know  the nature and  quality  of act he was  doing  or  that  what he  was doing  was  wrong i.e. a person  is  not  responsible  if  he is  not of sound mind   (section  84  IPC).

2)      Doctrine  of partial  responsibility: suffering  from  some  weakness  or  aberration  of mind  (though  not  completely  insane).

3)      Durhan  rule: Accused  is  not  responsible  for  the  act, if  his  act  resulted  from  mental disease  or defect.

4)      Currens  rule: A person is  not  responsible  if  at the  time  of  committing  the  crime,  he  did  not have the  capacity  to  regulate  his conduct according  to  the  requirments  of  law  as a result  of  his  mental disease  or defect.

 

Don’t Forget to Solve all the previous Year Question asked on FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY: INSANITY

Exit mobile version