Enzyme inhibition (competitive, non-competitive and uncompetitive)
The presence of a noncompetitive inhibitor can be implicated in which of the outcome?
| A |
Leads to both an increase in the Vmax of a reaction and an increase in the Km |
|
| B |
Leads to a decrease in the observed Vmax |
|
| C |
Leads to a decrease in Km and Vmax |
|
| D |
Leads to an increase in Km without affecting Vmax |
The presence of a noncompetitive inhibitor can be implicated in which of the outcome?
| A |
Leads to both an increase in the Vmax of a reaction and an increase in the Km |
|
| B |
Leads to a decrease in the observed Vmax |
|
| C |
Leads to a decrease in Km and Vmax |
|
| D |
Leads to an increase in Km without affecting Vmax |
In the presence of a noncompetitive inhibitor, Vmax is decreased, whereas Km is unchanged. The steady-state concentration of ES is decreased.
A competitive inhibitor of an enzyme will?
| A |
Alter the Vmax of the reaction |
|
| B |
Bind to the same site as the substrate |
|
| C |
Decrease the apparent Km for the substrate |
|
| D |
Decrease the turnover number |
A competitive inhibitor of an enzyme will?
| A |
Alter the Vmax of the reaction |
|
| B |
Bind to the same site as the substrate |
|
| C |
Decrease the apparent Km for the substrate |
|
| D |
Decrease the turnover number |
Substances that reduce the activity of an enzyme are called inhibitors.
Reversible inhibitors bind to an enzyme but rapidly dissociate from it [in contrast to irreversible inhibitors , which bind tightly and dissociate very slowly from the enzyme].
There are several types of reversible inhibitors:
In competitive inhibition-
| A |
Vmax unchanged |
|
| B |
Apparent Km unchanged |
|
| C |
Apparent Km decreased |
|
| D |
Vmax decreased |
In competitive inhibition-
| A |
Vmax unchanged |
|
| B |
Apparent Km unchanged |
|
| C |
Apparent Km decreased |
|
| D |
Vmax decreased |
Disopropyl phosphofluoridate (DFP) reacts with serine proteases irreversibly and therefore is :
| A |
Allosteric inhibitor |
|
| B |
Competitive inhibitor |
|
| C |
Non competitive inhibitor |
|
| D |
A repressor |
Disopropyl phosphofluoridate (DFP) reacts with serine proteases irreversibly and therefore is :
| A |
Allosteric inhibitor |
|
| B |
Competitive inhibitor |
|
| C |
Non competitive inhibitor |
|
| D |
A repressor |
True about competitive inhibition of enzyme:
| A |
T Km |
|
| B |
Km |
|
| C |
T Vmax |
|
| D |
No change in Km and Vmax |
True about competitive inhibition of enzyme:
| A |
T Km |
|
| B |
Km |
|
| C |
T Vmax |
|
| D |
No change in Km and Vmax |
In noncompetitive antagonism, the true statement is:
| A |
Km value decrease; V max normal |
|
| B |
Km value decreased; V max decreased |
|
| C |
Km value normal; V max decreased |
|
| D |
Km value decreased; V max increased |
In noncompetitive antagonism, the true statement is:
| A |
Km value decrease; V max normal |
|
| B |
Km value decreased; V max decreased |
|
| C |
Km value normal; V max decreased |
|
| D |
Km value decreased; V max increased |
Atropine is useful in organophosphate poisoning because it –
| A |
Reactivates acetylcholinesterase |
|
| B |
Competes with acetylcholine release |
|
| C |
Binds with both nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors |
|
| D |
Is a competitive antagonist of acetylcholine |
Atropine is useful in organophosphate poisoning because it –
| A |
Reactivates acetylcholinesterase |
|
| B |
Competes with acetylcholine release |
|
| C |
Binds with both nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors |
|
| D |
Is a competitive antagonist of acetylcholine |
Ans. is ‘d’ i.e., Is a competitive antagonist of acetylcholine
o Atropine acts as competitive antagonist at muscarinic receptors. It has no activity on nicotinic receptors and has nothing to do with Ach release.
Non competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase‑
| A |
Allopurinol |
|
| B |
Acetazolamide |
|
| C |
Bimatoprost |
|
| D |
Dipivefrine |
Non competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase‑
| A |
Allopurinol |
|
| B |
Acetazolamide |
|
| C |
Bimatoprost |
|
| D |
Dipivefrine |
Ans. is ‘b’ i.e., Acetazolamide
o Acetazolamide is non-competitive , reversible inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase.
True about non-depolarizing muscle relaxants :
| A |
Competitive inhibitor of acetylcholine |
|
| B |
Metabolised by pseudocholinesterase |
|
| C |
Hypothermia prolongs the block |
|
| D |
a and c |
True about non-depolarizing muscle relaxants :
| A |
Competitive inhibitor of acetylcholine |
|
| B |
Metabolised by pseudocholinesterase |
|
| C |
Hypothermia prolongs the block |
|
| D |
a and c |
A i.e. Competitive inhibitor of acetylcholine; C i.e. Hypothermia prolongs the block
Non-Depolarizing Neuromuscular Block
Non-depolariszing muscle relaxants are competitive blockers of ACh receptors on NAM. They don’t cause depolarization.
Among non-depolarizing blockers only, mivacuronium is metabolized by pseudocholineateraseQ. – Block is reversed by neostigmine and other anticholinesterases.
Block is potentiated by hypokalemia and Mg+2 Q
Ca+2 increases the release of ACh from nerve endings;thus partially antagonizes the blockQ Acodosis increases the duration and degree of block.
Mild cooling antagonize the block but greater cooling (<33°C) potentiates block Q
Which of the following anticancer drugs are competitive inhibitors of tyrosine kinase ‑
| A |
Imatinib and suntinib |
|
| B |
Letrozole |
|
| C |
Bicalutamide |
|
| D |
Fulvestrant |
Which of the following anticancer drugs are competitive inhibitors of tyrosine kinase ‑
| A |
Imatinib and suntinib |
|
| B |
Letrozole |
|
| C |
Bicalutamide |
|
| D |
Fulvestrant |
Ans. is ‘a’ i.e., Imatinib and suntinib
Molecular targeted agents
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
- Competitive inhibitors → Imatinib, Nilotinib, Sunitinib, Dasatinib, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Lapitinib, Sorafinib (Remember all ends with ‘ nib’).
- Monoclonal antibodies → Cetuximab, panitumomab.
- HER2/neu (ERB B2) inhibitors Monoclonal antibody – Transtuzumab.
- Targeted antibody → Gemtuzomab (anti CD-33), Rituximab (anti – CD20), Alemtuzumab (anti CD-52).
- Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor → Monoclonal antibody – Bevacizumab.
- Proteosome inhibitors → Bortezomib.
- Histone deacylase inhibitor → Vorinostat
- DNA – methyl transferase inhibitor → 5-azacytidine, 2-deoxy-5 azacytidine.
- All – trans – retinoic acid.
- Biological response modifier – Recombinant IL-2 (aldesleukin, denileukin).
If V max dec to 80% due to an inhibitor and Km is same as before which is the type of inhibition?
| A |
Competitive Equilibrium type |
|
| B |
Non competitive |
|
| C |
Competitive Non Equilibrium type |
|
| D |
None of the above |
If V max dec to 80% due to an inhibitor and Km is same as before which is the type of inhibition?
| A |
Competitive Equilibrium type |
|
| B |
Non competitive |
|
| C |
Competitive Non Equilibrium type |
|
| D |
None of the above |
Ans. is ‘b’ i.e., Non competitive
ENZYMATIC ACTIONS
- Drugs can either increase or decrease the rate of enzymatically mediated action. A.
Stimulation
- Stimulation of enzymes by drugs, that are truly foreign substances, is unusual.
- Enzyme stimulation is relevant to many endogenous mediators and modulators, eg: adrenaline stimulates adenylyl cyclase.
- Stimulation of an enzyme increases its affinity for the substrate so that rate constant (Km) of the reaction decreases.
- Enzyme activity can also be increased by enzyme induction ie synthesis of more enzyme. In this Km does not change.
True about non competitive inhibition are all except‑
| A |
Potency reduced |
|
| B |
Km unchanged |
|
| C |
V max reduced |
|
| D |
Binds to another site of receptor |
True about non competitive inhibition are all except‑
| A |
Potency reduced |
|
| B |
Km unchanged |
|
| C |
V max reduced |
|
| D |
Binds to another site of receptor |
Ans. is ‘a’ i.e., Potency reduced
Competitive antagonist
- Antagonist bind to the same receptors as agonist
- Antagonist resembles chemically with the agonist
- The same maximal response can be obtained
- Potency is reduced (Right shift of DRC)
- Km is increased but Vmax is unchanged
Non competitive antagonist
- Binds to another site of receptor
- Does not resemble
- Maximal response is supressed
- Efficacy is reduced (Flattening of DRC)
- Km is unchanged but Vmax. is reduced.
In Photograph depicting Kinetics of Enzyme reaction, Curve C depicts?

| A |
Enzyme induction |
|
| B |
Non-competitive inhibition |
|
| C |
Enzyme stimulation |
|
| D |
Competitive inhibition |
In Photograph depicting Kinetics of Enzyme reaction, Curve C depicts?

| A |
Enzyme induction |
|
| B |
Non-competitive inhibition |
|
| C |
Enzyme stimulation |
|
| D |
Competitive inhibition |
Ans: B.)Non-competitive inhibition
In the graph shown in the image, X-axis shows the Velocity(rate of reaction), Y-axis shows the substrate concentration,”A’-shows normal enzyme,”B” shows competitive inhibition and “C” shows non-competitive inhibition.
- This maximum rate of reaction is characteristic of a particular enzyme at a particular concentration and is known as the maximum velocity or Vmax.
- The substrate concentration that gives you a rate that is halfway to Vmax is called Km.
- Competitive inhibitors:
- They impair reaction progress by binding to an enzyme, often at the active site, and preventing the real substrate from binding.
- At any given time, only the competitive inhibitor or the substrate can be bound to the enzyme (not both).
- Competitive inhibition acts by decreasing the number of enzyme molecules available to bind the substrate.
- With a competitive inhibitor, the reaction can eventually reach its normal Vmax
- but it takes a higher concentration of substrate to get it there.Vmax is unchanged but Km is higher
- Noncompetitive inhibitors:
- They don’t prevent the substrate from binding to the enzyme.
- In fact, the inhibitor and substrate don’t affect one another’s binding to the enzyme at all.
- However, when the inhibitor is bound, the enzyme cannot catalyze its reaction to produce a product.
- Thus, noncompetitive inhibition acts by reducing the number of functional enzyme molecules that can carry out a reaction.
- With a noncompetitive inhibitor, the reaction can never reach its normal Vmax regardless of how much substrate we add.Km is unchanged.
Cyanide affects respiratory chain by ‑
| A |
Non-competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| B |
Competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| C |
Suicide irreversible inhibition |
|
| D |
Non-competitive irreversible inhibition |
Cyanide affects respiratory chain by ‑
| A |
Non-competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| B |
Competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| C |
Suicide irreversible inhibition |
|
| D |
Non-competitive irreversible inhibition |
Ans. is ‘d’ i.e., Non-competitive irreversible inhibition
Types of enzyme inhibition
- Enzyme inhibition is of two types :‑
- Reversible and
- Irreversible
- Reversible inhibition
Reversible inhibition may be of following types :‑
i) Competitive inhibition (substrate analogue inhibition)
- The inhibitor competes with substrate for catalytic (substrate-binding) site of enzyme.
- Inhibitor resembles substrate in structural configuration.
- Inhibition can be reversed by increasing the concentration of substrate.
- Competitive inhibition increases km of the enzyme but Vmax does not change.
- Examples of competitive inhibition are inhibition of succinate dehydrogenase by malonate, HMG CoA reductase by statins, carbonic anhydrase by acetazolamide and LDH by oxamate.
ii) Non-competitive inhibition
- Inhibitor binds at a site other than the substrate-binding site.
- Thus inhibitor can bind to both free enzyme and enzyme substrate complex.
- The inhibitor therefore lowers the concentration of active enzyme.
- A non-competitive inhibitor cause decrease in Vmax but no change in Km.
- Inhibition can be reversed only by exhaustive dialysis of inhibited enzyme.
Following is true statement about enzymes‑
| A |
In competitive inhibition Vmax unchanged but Km increased |
|
| B |
In uncompetitive inhibition Km unchanged but Vmax increased |
|
| C |
In uncompetitive inhibition Km unchanged but Vmax changed |
|
| D |
In uncompetitive inhibition mixed increase of Vmax and Km value |
Following is true statement about enzymes‑
| A |
In competitive inhibition Vmax unchanged but Km increased |
|
| B |
In uncompetitive inhibition Km unchanged but Vmax increased |
|
| C |
In uncompetitive inhibition Km unchanged but Vmax changed |
|
| D |
In uncompetitive inhibition mixed increase of Vmax and Km value |
Ans. is ‘a’ i.e., In competitive inhibition Vmax unchanged but Km increased
Type of inhibitor Km Vmax
Reversible inhibbitor
Competitive Increased No effect
Non-competitive No effect Decreased
Uncompititive Decreased Decreased
Irrversible inhibitor No effect Decreased (same as reversible competitive)
Cyanide affects respiratory chain by ‑
| A |
Non-competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| B |
Competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| C |
Suicide irreversible inhibition |
|
| D |
Non-competitive irreversible inhibition |
Cyanide affects respiratory chain by ‑
| A |
Non-competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| B |
Competitive reversible inhibition |
|
| C |
Suicide irreversible inhibition |
|
| D |
Non-competitive irreversible inhibition |
Ans. is ‘d’ i.e., Non-competitive irreversible inhibition
Substance which binds to substrate other than catalytic enzyme is ‑
| A |
Competitive inhibitor |
|
| B |
Non-competitive inhibitor |
|
| C |
Reversible inhibitor |
|
| D |
None of the above |
Substance which binds to substrate other than catalytic enzyme is ‑
| A |
Competitive inhibitor |
|
| B |
Non-competitive inhibitor |
|
| C |
Reversible inhibitor |
|
| D |
None of the above |
Ans. is ‘b’ i.e., Non-competitive inhibitor
Non-competitive inhibitor
- In this type of inhibition no competition occurs between substrate and inhibitor.
- Inhibitor is structurally different from substrate and binds to enzyme at a site other than the substrate binding (catalytic) site.
- Occupancy of this site by the inhibitor alters the shape of the enzyme such that its catalytic activity is reduced or lost.
- The substrate is still able to bind the enzyme, but the enzyme cannot catalyze the reaction when inhibitor is bound.
- Thus, the non-competitive inhibitor does not block the active site of enzyme, but behaves as though it were removing active enzyme from the solution.
- Evidently, unlike competitive inhibition, increasing the substrate concentration does not reverse the inhibition.
- Non-competitive inhibition may be reversible or irreversible.
Non competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase‑
| A |
Allopurinol |
|
| B |
Acetazolamide |
|
| C |
Bimatoprost |
|
| D |
Dipivefrine |
Non competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase‑
| A |
Allopurinol |
|
| B |
Acetazolamide |
|
| C |
Bimatoprost |
|
| D |
Dipivefrine |
Ans. is ‘b’ i.e., Acetazolamide
- Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors act by a non-competitive, reversible inhibition of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase.
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (acetazolamide)
- Carbonic anhydrase (CAse) is an enzyme which catalyzes the reversible reaction H20 + CO2 <—> H2CO, H 1-1++HCO3-.
- The enzyme is present in renal tubular cells (especially PT), gastric mucosa, exocrine pancrease, ciliary body of eye, brain and RBC.
- Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors inhibit intracellular CAse in PT cells resulting in slowing of hydration of CO2 —> decreased availability of H+ to exchange with luminal Na+ through Na+-1-1+ antiport.
- Inhibition of brush border CAse retards dehydration of H2CO3 in the tubular fluid so that less CO2 diffuses back into the cells.
- The net effect is inhibition of HCO3- (and accompanying Nat) reabsorption in PT –> alkaline diuresis. Secretion of fr in DT and CD is also inhibited. Though Fr is secreted at this site by Fr-ATPase, it is generated in
- the cell by CAse mediated reaction. As such, this is a subsidiary site of action of CAse inhibitors.
- For the same degree of natriuresis CAse inhibitors cause most marked kaliuresis compared to other diuretics.
- Read below
- Collecting tubule is the most important site of K.’ secretion by the kidney.
- IC+ secretion occurs in exchange with Ne.
- If Na’ load is higher in collecting tube’s it will be absorbed in exchange with K± and more K+ will be secreted, i.e. higher the Na+ load in CD, higher will be K+ excretion in urine.
- Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors act on proximal tubules, where maximum Na+ (70%) is absorbed —) they block this absorption and will cause maximum kaliuresis (K+ excretion in urine).
Extrarenal actions of acetazolamide
- Lowering of IOT due to decreased formation of aqueous humour.
- Decreased gastric HCL and pancreatic NaHCO3 secretion.
- Raised level of CO2 in brain and lowering of pH sedation and elevation of seizure threshold.
- Alteration of CO2 trasport in lungs and tissues.
Uses of CAse inhibitors
- Glaucoma
- Acute mountain sickness
- Periodic paralysis
- Epilepsy
- To alkalinise urine for UTI or to promote excretion of acidic drugs
- Dorazolamide and brinzolamide are used topically for glaucoma.
- Adverse effects
- Hypersensitivity reactions in patients sensitive to sulfonamides (CAse inhibitors are sulfonamide derivatives).
- Bone marrow depression, metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, drowsiness, paresthesias, fatigue and abdominal discomfort.
- In hepatic diseases may precipitate hepatic coma by interfering with urinary elimination of NH3.
- Contraindications for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
- COPD
- Hepatic cirrhosis
- Hyperchloremic acidosis
- Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (acetazolamide) can cause allergic reactions in patients hypersensitive to sulfonamides.



