ASSOCIATION AREAS
Absence of Corpus callosum leads to
| A |
Hemiparesis |
|
| B |
Hemisensory loss |
|
| C |
Astereognosis |
|
| D |
No neurological manifestations |
Absence of Corpus callosum leads to
| A |
Hemiparesis |
|
| B |
Hemisensory loss |
|
| C |
Astereognosis |
|
| D |
No neurological manifestations |
No neurological manifestations [Ref: Internet reference]
- Agenesis of corpus callosum is a rare birth defect (congenital disorder) in which there is complete or partial absence of corpus callosum.
- Corpus callosum is a band of tissue connecting the two hemispheres of the brain. Fibres of corpus callosum arise from the superficial layers of the cerebral cortex and they project to the homotypic regions of the contralateral cortex by passing through the corpus collosum while crossing the midline.
Clinical features of Agenesis of corpus callosum
- Signs and symptoms of agenesis of corpus callosum vary greatly among individuals.
- Patients usually do not have any neurological manifestations.
- However, some features common in agenesis of corpus callosum are:- Vision impairment
– Low muscle tone (hypotonia)
Poor motor coordination
– Delay in motor milestones such as sitting and walking.
Low perception of pain
– Delayed toilet training
– Chewing and swallowing difficulties
– Early speech and language delays
Social difficulties
- Other characteristics sometimes associated with callosal disorders are:- Seizures
– Spasticity
– Early, feeding difficulties and or gastric reflux-.
– Hearing impairments
– Abnormal head and facial features
– Mental retardation
Investigation
- CT and MRI reveal “Bat wing” deformity of the ventricles.
Treatment
- There are currently no specific medical treatments for callosal disorders.
An important point
- The neurological abnormalities associated with corpus callosum are not caused by absence of corpus callosum per se.
– These conditions are believed to be caused due to associated cerebral anomalies rather than in corpus callosum per sc.
– The most common associated brain anomalies with absent corpus callosum are
– Dandy walker malformation
– lnterhenfispheric cyst with hydrocephalus
– Migrational disorder
– Absence of the inferior vertnis
– The children who had the best prognosis without any significant neurological sequale were those with isolated agenesis of corpus collosum.
– The children with the worst prognosis and neurological sequale were those with agenesis of corpus callosum and migrational disorder with or without Dandy — walker malformation.
– Hence prognosis is determined primarily by the underlying or associated malformation.
Premotor area corresponds to?
| A |
Area 6 |
|
| B |
Area 7 |
|
| C |
Area 8 |
|
| D |
Area 12 |
Premotor area corresponds to?
| A |
Area 6 |
|
| B |
Area 7 |
|
| C |
Area 8 |
|
| D |
Area 12 |
Immediately in front of the primary motor cortex lies Brodmann’s area 6. Area 6 extends onto the medial surface, where it becomes contiguous with area 24 in the cingulate gyrus, anterior and inferior to the paracentral lobule. A number of functional motor areas are contained within this cortical region. Lateral area 6, the area over most of the lateral surface of the hemisphere, corresponds to the premotor cortex.
Neurophysiological defects present in right lobe involvement are A/E
| A |
Visuospatial defect |
|
| B |
Anosognosa |
|
| C |
Dyscalculia |
|
| D |
Dysgraphia |
Neurophysiological defects present in right lobe involvement are A/E
| A |
Visuospatial defect |
|
| B |
Anosognosa |
|
| C |
Dyscalculia |
|
| D |
Dysgraphia |
C i.e. Dyscalculia
– Categorical (dominant) hemisphere (ie left lobe in most cases) is responsible for sequential – analytic processes such as language (understanding language, verbal memory, motor speech, written & spoken language) and mathematical ability. Therefore lesions of left (dominant) side produce aphasias (receptive & expressive), dyslexia and dyscalculia.
– Representational (non dominant mostly right) hemisphere is responsible for visuo-spatial orientation & musical (art) awareness. Its lesion causes anosognosia and dysgraphia.
Cerebral Dominance or Complementary Specialization of Hemisphere
A patient being evaluated for aphasia is unable to repeat sentences correctly or to name objects properly. However, the patient’s speech is effortless and melodic. There arc frequent errors in word choice and obvious difficulties in comprehension. The remainder of the patient’s neurologic examination is normal. Damage in which area of the brain would account for this type of aphasia:
| A |
Posterior temporal and parietal lobes, dominant hemisphere |
|
| B |
Frontal and parietal lobes, dominant hemisphere |
|
| C |
Prefrontal and frontal regions, dominant hemisphere |
|
| D |
Posterior parietal and temporal lobes, nondominant hemisphere |
A patient being evaluated for aphasia is unable to repeat sentences correctly or to name objects properly. However, the patient’s speech is effortless and melodic. There arc frequent errors in word choice and obvious difficulties in comprehension. The remainder of the patient’s neurologic examination is normal. Damage in which area of the brain would account for this type of aphasia:
| A |
Posterior temporal and parietal lobes, dominant hemisphere |
|
| B |
Frontal and parietal lobes, dominant hemisphere |
|
| C |
Prefrontal and frontal regions, dominant hemisphere |
|
| D |
Posterior parietal and temporal lobes, nondominant hemisphere |
Answer is A (Posterior temporal and parietal lobes, dominant hemisphere):
Aphasias are disorders of understanding, thought and word finding and represent a lesion in the dominant (usually left) hemisphere. The patient in question represents a case of sensory / receptive Wernicke’s aphasia and hence a lesion in the temporal and parietal lobe of the dominant hemisphere.
Which of the following speech indicates damage to the categorical hemisphere:
| A |
Normal speech |
|
| B |
Increased speech |
|
| C |
Decreased speech |
|
| D |
Senseless, fluent speech |
Which of the following speech indicates damage to the categorical hemisphere:
| A |
Normal speech |
|
| B |
Increased speech |
|
| C |
Decreased speech |
|
| D |
Senseless, fluent speech |
Answer is D (Senseless, fluent speech):
Senseless fluent speech most closely suggests a diagnosis of Aphasia (Wernicke’s aphasia) which results from damage to the categorical or dominant hemisphere
Senseless, fluent speech suggests a diagnosis of ‘Wernicke ‘s ‘ Aphasia. Such disorders of speech represent a lesion is the categorical or dominant hemisphere
All of the following Neurophysiological defects are likely to result from right lobe involvement, except:
| A |
Visuospatial defects |
|
| B |
Anosognosia |
|
| C |
Dyscalculi |
|
| D |
Spatial Dysgraphia |
All of the following Neurophysiological defects are likely to result from right lobe involvement, except:
| A |
Visuospatial defects |
|
| B |
Anosognosia |
|
| C |
Dyscalculi |
|
| D |
Spatial Dysgraphia |
Answer is C (Dyscalculi)
Dyscalculi is a feature of categorical/dominant hemisphere involvement or left lobe involvement
Visuospatial defects, Anosognosia and Spatial dysgraphia are all features of non dominant / representative hemisphere involvement or right lobe involvement
|
Categorical Dominant Hemisphere Lesion |
Representative Non-Dominant Hemisphere lesion |
||
|
(Sequential Analytical Process & Language) |
(Visuospatial processing) |
||
|
Dysphasia/Aphasia (difficulty with words) |
• |
Neglect of contralateral side |
|
|
– Expressive / Motor (Braco’s) |
• |
Spatial disorientation |
|
|
– Sensory /Receptive Receptive (Wernicke’s) |
• |
Anosognosia |
|
|
Dyslexia (difficulty with words) |
• |
Dressing Apraxia (Apraxia is a misnomer) |
|
|
Dysgraphia (difficulty with drawing) |
|
(Problem results from visuospatial disorientation of body parts to clothing) |
|
|
Dyscalculia (difficulty with calculations) |
• |
Constructional Apraxia (Apraxia is a misnomer) |
|
|
Dyspraxia (difficulty to perform complex |
|
(Inability to copy complex shapes due to visuospatial disorientation) |
|
|
motor tasks) |
• |
Astereognosis |
|
|
|
• |
Afferent Dysgraphia (Spatial Dysgraphias) |
|
|
|
• |
Impaired musical skills (tonal perception) |
|
|
|
• |
Impaired non-verbal memory |
|
Features of occipital lobe of brain are all except:
March 2008
| A |
Visual cortex lies in relation to calcarine fissure |
|
| B |
Brodmann’s area 17 corresponds to visual cortex |
|
| C |
Geniculocalcarine fibres from the medial half of the lateral geniculate terminate on the superior lip of the calcarine fissure |
|
| D |
Its the only area in the brain activated by visual stimuli |
Features of occipital lobe of brain are all except:
March 2008
| A |
Visual cortex lies in relation to calcarine fissure |
|
| B |
Brodmann’s area 17 corresponds to visual cortex |
|
| C |
Geniculocalcarine fibres from the medial half of the lateral geniculate terminate on the superior lip of the calcarine fissure |
|
| D |
Its the only area in the brain activated by visual stimuli |
Ans. D: Its the only area in the brain activated by visual stimuli
Processing of tactile stimulation occurs in Brodmann’s area ‑
| A |
1,2,3 |
|
| B |
4, 6 |
|
| C |
44,45 |
|
| D |
41,42 |
Processing of tactile stimulation occurs in Brodmann’s area ‑
| A |
1,2,3 |
|
| B |
4, 6 |
|
| C |
44,45 |
|
| D |
41,42 |
Ans. is ‘a’ i.e., 1, 2, 3
- Processing of general sensory inputs primarily occurs in primary somatosensory area of parietal lobe.
- Primary somatosensory area is Brodmann’s areas 3, 1, 2.
